![]() Once the United States adopts the CPBS, it should be internationalized through a multinational “SAFE Framework to Counter Pandemics. Based on the behavior of COVID-19, as well as new viral threats that are most likely to generate future pandemics, a robust border strategy can play a key role in “flattening the curve”: reducing both lives lost and damage to the U.S. ![]() Although no single measure can eliminate threats such as terrorism or a pandemic, there are many countermeasures that can be taken, and given what is at stake, there is every reason to put the eight core elements of the CPBS in place. government reacted to a truly devastating threat at its borders. ![]() ports of entry in the wake of 9/11, the last time the U.S. Robert Bonner and Gillian Horton, September 28, 2020īecause there is an important role for improved, robust border screening against pandemics, we propose a Counter-Pandemic Border Strategy (CPBS) that draws on successful strategies put in place at foreign and U.S. Lessons Learned: Why the United States Needs a Counter-Pandemic Border Strategy In addition, it closes with select proposals for a longer-term change agenda that would require legislation. The paper provides recommendations that can be accomplished within the current authority of the secretary of homeland security and the executive branch. Managing immigration as a system calls for coordinated operational capabilities, decision-making structures, and resource allocations. We argue that immigration is a system that spans both intra-DHS and interagency organizational entities and processes, and that it must operate as a system to successfully carry out its duties. It identifies four key organizational areas of concern-mission, institutional structures, funding priorities, and institutional culture-essential to the vitality and governance of the U.S. This paper examines questions of structure-as compared with leadership and policy-and proposes changes that would enable more effective and humane implementation of the nation’s immigration laws. Read the full paper (PDF).ĭoris Meissner and Ruth Ellen Wasem, April 11, 2022 The paper concludes with recommendations on how to adapt the current emergency response systems to function as a North American Emergency Response Compact. These historic and current deficiencies support the creation of a more robust tri-lateral agreement to deal with the pressing nature of evolving emergency response threats in the future. It analyzes the challenges in emergency response and the resulting shortfalls of existing agreements, as well as considering lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. This paper briefly examines the history of emergency response coordination among the United States, Mexico, and Canada, highlighting some of the major bilateral, regional and non-governmental agreements. Establishing a North American approach is a key component to more comprehensive and effective emergency management structured to meet current and emerging threats. To meet these challenges, North America must progress beyond the historic approach to cross-border emergency management, which has consisted primarily of sharing information, to a more systemic and operational cooperation. Toward an Integrated North American Emergency Response System These recommendations are geared to promote the development of a cross-border, public-private regulatory and enforcement framework within which companies can build more ethical and resilient supply chains. Government should establish channels for regular communication and information-sharing with foreign governments concerning forced labor enforcement efforts. ![]() Second, CBP should develop a voluntary disclosure regime with meaningful incentives for importers to report potential issues in their supply chains and undertake proactive corrective action. First, CBP should enhance the transparency of its forced labor investigative and enforcement activities to better enable the private sector to direct resources to due diligence and remediation. Government efforts to counter forced labor in global supply chains. This paper outlines several recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of U.S. ![]() Sarah Bishop, Tom Plotkin and Emanuel Ghebregergis, January, 2023 Combatting Forced Labor in Global Supply Chains ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |